Skip to content

Navigating Network Security: Should You Replace or Combine Business VPNs with SASE?

As organizations like yours navigate the complex landscape of network security, a pivotal decision arises: Should you replace traditional business VPNs with the modern SASE framework, or is a combination of both the optimal strategy? This question is increasingly relevant as enterprises strive to balance robust security measures with efficient network performance. The evolving digital environment, characterized by remote work, cloud services, and ever-growing cyber threats, demands a reassessment of traditional security models.

Business VPNs, long regarded as the backbone of secure remote access, have served organizations well by creating encrypted tunnels for data transmission across public networks. They offer a straightforward, reliable means of ensuring that remote employees can securely access corporate resources. However, as the digital landscape has grown more complex, the limitations of VPNs have become more apparent. Issues such as scalability challenges, latency, and the difficulty of managing multiple point solutions have prompted organizations to explore more integrated and holistic security approaches.

Enter Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), a modern framework that promises to address many of these limitations.

SASE, pronounced “sassy,” is not just a single technology but a comprehensive architecture that combines network security functions (such as Secure Web Gateways, Cloud Access Security Brokers, Zero Trust Network Access, and Firewall as a Service) with Wide Area Network capabilities (like SD-WAN). By delivering these capabilities as a unified cloud service, SASE aims to provide secure and efficient access to applications, regardless of the user’s location.

The emergence of SASE has sparked a significant debate within the IT and security communities. Should organizations abandon their traditional business VPNs in favor of SASE, which offers a more integrated and flexible approach to network security? Or is a hybrid strategy, which combines the strengths of both VPNs and SASE, a more prudent choice during this transitional period? This key question—Business VPNs vs. SASE: Choosing the Right Path for Network and Security Transformation—underpins a critical decision that can shape an organization’s security posture for years to come.

Understanding Business VPNs and SASE

In the quest to secure their networks, organizations have traditionally relied on Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). However, as the digital landscape evolves, newer frameworks like Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) are gaining traction. To understand the decision of whether to replace or combine these technologies, it’s crucial to grasp their definitions, functionalities, and use cases.

Business VPNs: Definition, Functionality, and Traditional Use Cases

Definition: A Business VPN (Virtual Private Network) creates a secure and encrypted connection over a less secure network, such as the internet. This technology ensures that data transmitted between a remote user and the corporate network remains confidential and protected from unauthorized access.

Functionality: The core functionality of a VPN is to provide a secure tunnel for data transmission. Here’s how it works:

  1. Encryption: VPNs use encryption protocols to ensure that data sent over the internet is unreadable to anyone who intercepts it.
  2. Authentication: Users must authenticate themselves, typically using credentials like usernames and passwords, before gaining access to the VPN.
  3. Tunneling: VPNs encapsulate data packets within other packets to create a “tunnel” through which the encrypted data travels.

Traditional Use Cases:

  1. Remote Access: One of the most common uses of VPNs is to provide remote employees with secure access to the corporate network. This is particularly crucial for organizations with a distributed workforce.
  2. Site-to-Site Connectivity: VPNs connect multiple fixed sites, such as different office locations, enabling them to communicate securely over the internet.
  3. Data Privacy: VPNs are also used to maintain data privacy, preventing sensitive information from being accessed or tampered with by external entities.

While VPNs have been a staple in network security, they are not without limitations. Scalability can be a significant issue as the number of remote users increases. Additionally, VPNs often struggle with latency and performance degradation, especially when multiple point solutions are involved in managing security.

SASE (Secure Access Service Edge)

Definition: Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) is a network architecture model introduced by Gartner in 2019. SASE converges network security and WAN (Wide Area Network) capabilities into a unified, cloud-native service model. The goal is to provide seamless, secure access to applications, services, and data regardless of user location.

Components:

  1. SD-WAN (Software-Defined Wide Area Network): Enhances WAN performance by intelligently routing traffic across multiple connections, improving application performance and reliability.
  2. SWG (Secure Web Gateway): Protects users from web-based threats by filtering and monitoring web traffic, blocking malicious content, and enforcing web usage policies.
  3. CASB (Cloud Access Security Broker): Provides visibility and control over cloud service usage, ensuring data security, compliance, and threat protection for cloud-based applications.
  4. ZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access): Ensures that access to resources is granted based on strict identity verification and least-privilege principles, rather than assuming implicit trust based on network location.
  5. FWaaS (Firewall as a Service): Delivers firewall capabilities, such as traffic inspection and threat prevention, as a cloud-based service.

Advantages:

  1. Unified Security Framework: SASE integrates multiple security functions into a single platform, reducing complexity and streamlining management.
  2. Scalability: Being cloud-native, SASE easily scales to accommodate the growing number of remote users and devices without significant performance degradation.
  3. Improved Performance: By optimizing traffic routing and reducing the reliance on backhauling data through central data centers, SASE can enhance application performance and user experience.
  4. Flexibility: SASE supports a wide range of use cases, from remote access to branch connectivity, making it a versatile solution for modern network architectures.
  5. Cost Efficiency: Consolidating various security and networking functions into a single service model can reduce the need for multiple point solutions, thereby lowering overall costs.

SASE addresses many of the shortcomings of traditional VPNs. For instance, its cloud-native architecture ensures that security policies are consistently applied, regardless of the user’s location. This is particularly important in an era where remote work and cloud services are prevalent. Moreover, SASE’s integrated approach simplifies the management of security services, reducing the operational burden on IT teams.

As organizations continue to adopt cloud services and support increasingly remote workforces, the limitations of traditional VPNs become more pronounced. VPNs were designed for a time when most employees worked on-premises, and applications were hosted in centralized data centers. In contrast, SASE is built for the cloud era, offering a more flexible and scalable solution that aligns with modern IT and business needs.

In summary, while Business VPNs have been indispensable for secure remote access and site-to-site connectivity, their limitations in scalability, performance, and complexity management are driving the need for more advanced solutions like SASE. SASE not only addresses these limitations but also provides a comprehensive security framework that is well-suited to the dynamic and distributed nature of today’s digital environments. Understanding the fundamental differences between VPNs and SASE, as well as their respective advantages, is essential for organizations making strategic decisions about their network security transformations.

We now introduce and discuss four main options for organizations as think through their choices between business VPNs and SASE.

Option 1: The SASE-Only Approach

The SASE-Only Strategy

The Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) framework represents a transformative shift in how network security is architected and delivered. The SASE-only strategy entails fully replacing traditional networking and security solutions, such as Business VPNs, with an integrated SASE solution. This approach leverages the convergence of wide area networking (WAN) and network security services like secure web gateways (SWG), cloud access security brokers (CASB), zero trust network access (ZTNA), and firewall as a service (FWaaS) into a unified, cloud-native platform.

The SASE-only strategy is driven by the need for a more streamlined, scalable, and flexible network security framework that can handle the demands of modern digital enterprises. With the increasing adoption of cloud services, the proliferation of remote work, and the rise in sophisticated cyber threats, traditional perimeter-based security models are no longer sufficient. SASE, designed with these contemporary challenges in mind, offers a holistic solution that ensures secure, seamless access to applications and data from any location.

Benefits of the SASE-Only Approach

  1. Unified Security Framework:
    • Integrated Solutions: SASE consolidates multiple security functions into a single platform, eliminating the need for disparate point solutions. This integration simplifies the deployment and management of security services.
    • Consistent Policy Enforcement: A unified framework ensures that security policies are uniformly applied across all access points, reducing the risk of policy gaps and inconsistencies.
  2. Simplified Management:
    • Centralized Control: SASE platforms provide centralized management consoles, enabling IT teams to monitor and control network and security policies from a single interface. This reduces administrative overhead and improves visibility.
    • Automated Updates: Cloud-native SASE solutions automatically receive updates and patches, ensuring that the latest security measures are always in place without manual intervention.
  3. Enhanced Performance:
    • Optimized Traffic Routing: SASE uses software-defined WAN (SD-WAN) capabilities to intelligently route traffic through the most efficient paths, improving application performance and reducing latency.
    • Reduced Backhauling: By eliminating the need to route traffic through central data centers, SASE minimizes backhauling, leading to faster and more direct access to cloud-based applications.
  4. Scalability:
    • Elastic Resources: SASE solutions, being cloud-native, can easily scale to accommodate growing numbers of users and devices, providing consistent performance regardless of the load.
    • Global Reach: Many SASE providers have a global network of points of presence (PoPs), ensuring low-latency access and robust performance for users worldwide.

Challenges of the SASE-Only Approach

  1. Transition Complexity:
    • Migration Efforts: Moving from a traditional network security setup to a SASE framework requires careful planning and execution. This includes migrating security policies, data flows, and user access configurations.
    • Skill Requirements: IT teams may need to acquire new skills and expertise to manage and operate SASE solutions effectively, necessitating training and potential hiring.
  2. Potential Disruptions:
    • Operational Downtime: During the transition to SASE, there may be periods of operational downtime as systems are reconfigured and tested. This can impact business continuity if not managed properly.
    • User Adaptation: End-users may experience a learning curve as they adapt to new access methods and security protocols, which could temporarily affect productivity.
  3. Cost Considerations:
    • Initial Investment: Implementing a SASE framework can involve significant upfront costs, including subscription fees for cloud services and potential infrastructure upgrades.
    • Ongoing Expenses: While SASE can reduce some operational costs, organizations must account for ongoing subscription fees and the potential need for additional cloud resources.

Overall, the SASE-only approach offers substantial benefits in terms of streamlined management, improved performance, and enhanced security. However, organizations must carefully weigh these advantages against the complexities and costs associated with transitioning to a new network security paradigm.

Option 2: Combining Business VPNs and SASE

The Hybrid Strategy Combining VPNs and SASE

A hybrid strategy that combines Business VPNs and SASE seeks to leverage the strengths of both technologies while mitigating their respective limitations. This approach does not entirely replace traditional VPNs but rather integrates them with the advanced capabilities of SASE. By doing so, organizations can achieve a more layered and flexible security architecture that caters to diverse needs and scenarios.

The hybrid strategy typically involves maintaining existing VPN infrastructure for specific use cases, such as site-to-site connectivity and legacy applications, while adopting SASE for remote access, cloud services, and modern application environments. This blended approach provides a gradual transition path, allowing organizations to modernize their network security framework without disrupting ongoing operations.

Benefits of the Hybrid Strategy

  1. Layered Security Approach:
    • Defense in Depth: By combining VPNs with SASE, organizations can implement a multi-layered security strategy that offers robust protection against a wide range of threats.
    • Redundancy and Resilience: The coexistence of VPN and SASE solutions provides additional layers of security, ensuring that if one layer is compromised, others remain intact.
  2. Flexibility:
    • Use Case Optimization: Organizations can optimize their network security strategy by using VPNs for scenarios where they excel (e.g., site-to-site connectivity) and SASE for modern requirements (e.g., secure remote access to cloud services).
    • Customizable Policies: The hybrid approach allows for tailored security policies that can be fine-tuned to meet the specific needs of different user groups and applications.
  3. Gradual Transition:
    • Phased Implementation: The hybrid strategy supports a phased implementation, enabling organizations to gradually introduce SASE capabilities while retaining their existing VPN infrastructure. This reduces the risk of operational disruption.
    • Ease of Adaptation: By maintaining familiar VPN systems, end-users can continue to work with minimal disruption while new SASE features are introduced incrementally.

Challenges of the Hybrid Strategy

  1. Increased Complexity:
    • Integration Efforts: Combining VPNs with SASE requires careful integration to ensure seamless interoperability between the two technologies. This can be complex and resource-intensive.
    • Management Overhead: Managing and monitoring two distinct systems (VPN and SASE) can increase administrative overhead, requiring additional effort to maintain consistency and efficiency.
  2. Potential Redundancy:
    • Overlapping Functions: There may be functional overlaps between VPNs and SASE, leading to redundancy and potential inefficiencies. Organizations must carefully design their security architecture to avoid unnecessary duplication.
    • Resource Allocation: Balancing the allocation of resources between VPN and SASE solutions can be challenging, especially in terms of bandwidth and performance optimization.
  3. Integration Issues:
    • Compatibility Concerns: Ensuring compatibility between legacy VPN systems and modern SASE platforms can be challenging, requiring thorough testing and potential customization.
    • Policy Harmonization: Harmonizing security policies across VPN and SASE can be complex, necessitating a unified approach to policy management and enforcement.

Despite these challenges, the hybrid strategy offers a pragmatic path forward for organizations looking to enhance their network security posture while maintaining operational continuity. By combining the strengths of VPNs and SASE, organizations can create a versatile and resilient security framework that addresses both legacy and modern requirements.

Option 3: Gradual Transition Strategy

The Phased Approach to Integrating SASE While Maintaining VPNs

The gradual transition strategy involves a phased approach to integrating SASE capabilities while maintaining the existing VPN infrastructure. This method allows organizations to systematically adopt SASE features without the need for a complete and immediate overhaul of their network security architecture. Instead, they can incrementally implement SASE components, evaluate their effectiveness, and adjust their deployment strategy as needed.

This approach is particularly beneficial for large enterprises with complex network environments and significant investments in legacy systems. It enables them to modernize their security framework at a manageable pace, reducing the risk of operational disruption and ensuring that each phase of the transition is thoroughly tested and optimized.

Benefits of the Gradual Transition Strategy

  1. Smooth Transition:
    • Minimized Disruption: By implementing SASE in phases, organizations can minimize disruption to their operations, allowing for a more controlled and stable transition process.
    • User Adaptation: A gradual approach gives users time to adapt to new security protocols and access methods, reducing the risk of resistance and productivity loss.
  2. Risk Mitigation:
    • Incremental Testing: Each phase of the transition can be thoroughly tested and validated before proceeding to the next, ensuring that potential issues are identified and addressed early.
    • Fallback Options: Maintaining the existing VPN infrastructure provides a fallback option in case of unexpected problems with the new SASE components, ensuring business continuity.
  3. Tailored Implementation:
    • Customizable Phases: Organizations can customize the transition phases to align with their specific needs, priorities, and resources, ensuring a tailored and efficient implementation.
    • Resource Allocation: The phased approach allows for better resource allocation, enabling organizations to spread out costs and investments over time.

Challenges of the Gradual Transition Strategy

  1. Transitional Management:
    • Coexistence Management: Managing the coexistence of VPN and SASE systems during the transition period requires careful planning and coordination to ensure seamless interoperability.
    • Policy Harmonization: Harmonizing security policies across both systems can be challenging, necessitating a unified approach to policy management and enforcement.
  2. Temporary Complexity:
    • Dual Systems: Running dual systems (VPN and SASE) during the transition can increase complexity, requiring additional administrative effort and expertise.
    • Increased Overhead: The need to manage and monitor two distinct systems can temporarily increase operational overhead until the transition is complete.
  3. Potential Overlap:
    • Functional Overlap: There may be temporary functional overlaps between VPN and SASE components during the transition, leading to redundancy and potential inefficiencies.
    • Resource Management: Balancing resource allocation between the two systems can be challenging, requiring careful planning and optimization.

Overall, the gradual transition strategy provides a balanced and pragmatic approach to adopting SASE while maintaining operational stability. By implementing SASE components in phases, organizations can modernize their network security framework at a manageable pace, ensuring a smooth and effective transition.

Option 4: VPN-Centric with SASE Enhancements

Enhancing Existing VPN Infrastructure with SASE Features

For organizations heavily invested in their existing VPN infrastructure, enhancing this setup with SASE features offers a viable path forward. This strategy focuses on augmenting the current VPN framework with specific SASE capabilities, such as secure web gateways (SWG), cloud access security brokers (CASB), and zero trust network access (ZTNA), without fully transitioning to a SASE-only model.

This approach leverages the strengths of the existing VPN infrastructure while gradually introducing modern security features to address emerging threats and requirements. It allows organizations to enhance their security posture incrementally, making the most of their current investments while moving towards a more integrated and comprehensive security model.

Benefits of the VPN-Centric Approach with SASE Enhancements

  1. Leveraging Current Investments:
    • Cost Efficiency: By enhancing the existing VPN infrastructure with SASE features, organizations can avoid the significant upfront costs associated with a complete overhaul.
    • Maximized ROI: This approach maximizes the return on investment (ROI) from existing VPN systems by extending their capabilities with modern security functions.
  2. Incremental Improvements:
    • Targeted Enhancements: Organizations can selectively introduce SASE components to address specific security needs, allowing for targeted and incremental improvements.
    • Scalable Adoption: The adoption of SASE features can be scaled according to organizational priorities and resources, ensuring a manageable and sustainable transition.
  3. Cost Efficiency:
    • Reduced Upfront Costs: Enhancing existing VPN infrastructure with SASE features reduces the need for significant upfront investments, making it a cost-effective approach.
    • Operational Continuity: This strategy allows for continuous operation of the existing VPN infrastructure while gradually integrating new SASE capabilities, ensuring minimal disruption.

Challenges of the VPN-Centric Approach with SASE Enhancements

  1. Limited Modernization:
    • Partial Modernization: Enhancing existing VPN infrastructure with SASE features may not achieve the full modernization benefits of a complete SASE implementation.
    • Legacy Limitations: The limitations of the legacy VPN infrastructure may still pose challenges, such as scalability and performance issues.
  2. Potential Gaps in Security Coverage:
    • Incomplete Integration: The integration of SASE features into the existing VPN infrastructure may not provide comprehensive security coverage, leaving potential gaps in protection.
    • Policy Consistency: Ensuring consistent policy enforcement across the hybrid system can be challenging, requiring careful coordination and management.
  3. Management Complexity:
    • Dual Systems: Managing and monitoring both the existing VPN infrastructure and the new SASE components can increase complexity and administrative overhead.
    • Interoperability Issues: Ensuring seamless interoperability between legacy VPN systems and modern SASE features can be challenging, necessitating thorough testing and potential customization.

So, which option should you choose for your organization?

Choosing the Right Approach for Your Organization

When determining the best path for network and security transformation, organizations face a crucial decision:

Should they fully embrace the Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) framework, maintain their traditional Business VPNs, or adopt a hybrid approach?

We now discuss the factors that should guide this decision and emphasizes the value of a hybrid strategy that combines Business VPNs and SASE with a gradual transition. Ultimately, the chosen approach must be tailored to the specific needs and context of the organization.

Factors to Consider

  1. Current Network Security Infrastructure:
    • Assessment of Existing Systems: Organizations must start by thoroughly assessing their current network security infrastructure. This includes evaluating the capabilities, limitations, and performance of their existing VPN systems and other security solutions.
    • Compatibility and Integration: Consider how well existing systems can integrate with new SASE components. Compatibility issues can complicate the transition and increase costs, so it’s important to identify any potential challenges early.
  2. Organizational Needs:
    • Business Requirements: Different organizations have varying needs based on their industry, size, and operational model. For instance, a financial institution with stringent regulatory requirements might prioritize robust data protection and compliance features, while a tech startup might focus on scalability and flexibility.
    • User Demographics: Understanding the user base—such as the proportion of remote workers, on-site employees, and third-party collaborators—helps in designing an appropriate network security strategy.
  3. Budget:
    • Cost-Benefit Analysis: Transitioning to a new network security framework involves costs related to infrastructure upgrades, subscription fees, training, and potential downtime. Organizations need to conduct a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis to determine the financial feasibility of different approaches.
    • Long-Term Savings: While the initial investment in SASE might be high, it can lead to long-term savings through simplified management, reduced hardware costs, and improved operational efficiency.
  4. IT Capabilities:
    • Skill Sets: The success of any network security strategy hinges on the expertise and readiness of the IT team. Organizations must evaluate whether their IT staff have the necessary skills to manage and operate SASE solutions, or if additional training or hiring is required.
    • Resource Availability: Implementing and managing a hybrid or new security framework demands resources. Organizations must ensure they have the necessary personnel and technological resources to support the transition and ongoing operations.

The Hybrid Approach: Combining Business VPNs and SASE with a Gradual Transition Strategy

A hybrid approach that combines Business VPNs and SASE, implemented through a gradual transition strategy, offers a balanced and pragmatic solution. This strategy leverages the strengths of both technologies while addressing their respective limitations, allowing for a smoother and less disruptive transformation.

  1. Layered Security Framework:
    • Defense in Depth: By maintaining VPNs for certain use cases and integrating SASE for others, organizations can create a multi-layered security architecture. This layered approach enhances protection against diverse threats by ensuring multiple lines of defense.
    • Redundancy and Resilience: A hybrid setup provides redundancy, ensuring that if one system encounters issues, the other can compensate, thereby enhancing overall resilience.
  2. Flexibility and Customization:
    • Use Case Optimization: Organizations can optimize their security setup by using VPNs for scenarios where they are most effective (e.g., site-to-site connectivity) and deploying SASE for modern requirements such as secure remote access and cloud services.
    • Tailored Policies: A hybrid strategy allows for the customization of security policies to meet the specific needs of different user groups, applications, and data types.
  3. Phased Implementation:
    • Minimized Disruption: Gradual integration of SASE components ensures minimal disruption to ongoing operations. By introducing SASE in phases, organizations can carefully manage and mitigate risks associated with the transition.
    • Incremental Testing and Adjustment: Each phase of the transition can be tested and optimized before moving to the next, allowing for incremental adjustments based on real-world performance and feedback.
  4. Cost Management:
    • Spread-Out Investment: A phased approach spreads out the financial investment over time, making it more manageable. Organizations can prioritize critical areas for immediate upgrade and defer less urgent improvements.
    • Leveraging Existing Infrastructure: By continuing to use existing VPN infrastructure where appropriate, organizations can maximize the return on their previous investments while gradually incorporating new technologies.

Tailoring the Approach to Your Organization’s Context

While a hybrid approach with a gradual transition is generally advantageous, it is essential to tailor the strategy to the unique context of each organization. This customization ensures that the network security framework aligns with specific operational needs, business goals, and risk profiles.

  1. Industry-Specific Requirements:
    • Compliance and Regulations: Different industries have unique regulatory requirements and compliance standards. For instance, healthcare organizations must adhere to HIPAA regulations, while financial institutions must comply with PCI DSS. The chosen security strategy must address these specific regulatory needs.
    • Threat Landscape: The prevalent threats in an industry also influence the security strategy. For example, manufacturing companies might prioritize protection against industrial espionage and operational disruptions, while tech firms might focus on data breaches and intellectual property theft.
  2. Organizational Size and Structure:
    • Scalability Needs: Smaller organizations might prefer a more straightforward, cost-effective approach, while larger enterprises might require scalable solutions that can handle complex, global operations.
    • Geographical Distribution: Organizations with a dispersed workforce and multiple locations need solutions that provide consistent security and performance across all sites. SASE’s global PoPs can be particularly beneficial in such scenarios.
  3. Digital Transformation Goals:
    • Cloud Adoption: Organizations at different stages of cloud adoption might have varying needs. Those heavily invested in cloud services can benefit significantly from SASE’s cloud-native security features, while others still reliant on on-premises systems might need a more balanced approach.
    • Remote Work Policies: The extent of remote work adoption influences the network security strategy. Organizations with a significant remote workforce can leverage SASE’s secure remote access capabilities to enhance productivity and security.
  4. Risk Tolerance and Security Posture:
    • Risk Assessment: Conducting a thorough risk assessment helps in understanding the organization’s risk tolerance and identifying critical areas that need enhanced protection.
    • Proactive vs. Reactive: Organizations with a proactive security posture might opt for a more aggressive transition to SASE to stay ahead of evolving threats, while those with a reactive approach might prefer a gradual, low-risk transition.
  5. Vendor and Solution Selection:
    • Vendor Capabilities: The capabilities and reliability of SASE vendors can vary. Organizations should evaluate vendors based on their service offerings, performance, support, and reputation.
    • Interoperability: Ensuring that the chosen SASE solution integrates well with existing systems and future plans is crucial for a smooth transition.

Conclusion

Choosing the right approach for network and security transformation is a complex decision that requires careful consideration of various factors, including the current network security infrastructure, organizational needs, budget, and IT capabilities. While fully adopting SASE offers numerous benefits, the transition can be challenging and costly. On the other hand, maintaining traditional VPNs might not provide the necessary security and flexibility for modern demands.

A hybrid strategy that combines Business VPNs and SASE, implemented through a gradual transition, emerges as a balanced and pragmatic solution. This approach leverages the strengths of both technologies, providing a layered security framework, flexibility, and cost management. By tailoring the strategy to the specific context of the organization—considering industry requirements, organizational size, digital transformation goals, and risk tolerance—businesses can ensure a secure and efficient network security transformation.

Ultimately, the choice of approach between using business VPNs and/or SASE should be the one that aligns with your organization’s unique needs and long-term objectives. By taking a thoughtful and strategic approach, your organization can navigate the complexities of network security transformation and build a robust, future-proof security framework that supports your business goals and safeguards your digital assets.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *